Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous estimation of Terbinafine hydrochloride and Mometasone furoate in Combined Dosage Form
Heta D. Patel*, Mehul M. Patel
Department of Quality Assurance, Ramanbhai Patel College of Pharmacy,
Charotar University of Science and Technology, Changa-388 421, Gujarat, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: hetapatel32@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Terbinafine hydrochloride (TH) is a antifungal drug and Mometasone furoate(MF) is a glucocorticoid. This combination of drug is useful for relief of corticosteroid responsive dermatoses where fungal infections are present, suspected, or likely to occur. Accurate, precise, rapid and economical method was developed for the simultaneous estimation of Terbinafine hydrochloride (TH) and Mometasone furoate(MF) in cream dosage form. Method is based on the absorption correction method and wavelengths selected for analysis were 282.0nm (λmax of Terbinafine hydrochloride) and 248.0 nm (λmax of Mometasone furoate) respectively, in methanol. The linearity was obtained in the concentration range of 10-70μg/ml for Terbinafine hydrochloride and 1-7μg/ml for Mometasone furoate. The correlation coefficient of Terbinafine hydrochloride and Mometasone furoate were found to be 0.999 and 0.998 respectively. The proposed procedure was successfully applied for the simultaneous determination of both drugs in commercial cream preparation. The results of the analysis have been validated statistically and by recovery studies have confirmed the accuracy of proposed method.
KEYWORDS: Terbinafine hydrochloride (TH), Mometasone furoate(MF), Absorption correction method, Ultra-Violet Spectrometric method (UV Spectrometric method).
Terbinafine hydrochloride (TH) is a antifungal and enzyme inhibitor drug. Chemically, it is (2E)-N,6,6-Trimethyl-N-(naphthalen-1-ylmethyl)hept-2-en-4-yn-1-amine hydrochloride[1], clinically used in the treatment of dermatophyte infections of the toenail or fingernail caused by susceptible fungi. Also for the treatment of Tinea capitis (scalp ringworm) and Tinea corporis (body ringworm) or Tinea cruris (jock itch). [1]. Mometasone furoate(MF) is a glucocorticoid having anti-inflammatory activity and chemically it is 9,21-Dichloro-11β-hydroxy-16α-methyl-3,20-dioxopregna-1,4-dien-17-yl furan-2-carboxylate and it is also useful treatment of dermatological diseases[2].
Both the drugs are marketed as combined dose cream formulation in the ratio of 10:1 w/w TH: MF. Literature survey reveals that Terbinafine hydrochloride(TH) can be estimated by spectrophotometrically, by HPTLC and by HPLC individually or with other drugs in bulk drugs and in human plasma[5-23], while Mometasone furoate(MF) can be estimated by spectrophotometrically, HPLC and HPTLC in combination with other drugs[24-35]. However, there is no analytical method has been reported for the estimation of TH and MF in a combined dosage formulation. Present work describes the absorption correction method[3] for simultaneous estimation of TH and MF in cream formulation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Instrument
A double-beam Shimadzu-1800 UV- Visible spectrophotometer, with spectral bandwidth of 2 nm, wavelength accuracy ± 0.5 nm and a pair of 1-cm matched quartz cells was used to measure absorbance of the resulting solution.
Figure 1: UV-Spectra of Terbinafine hydrochloride (10µg/ml)
Figure 2: UV-Spectra of Mometasone furoate (1µg/ml)
Figure 3: Overlay UV-Spectra of Terbinafine hydrochloride (10µg/ml), Mometasone furoate(1µg/ml) and mixture(10µg/ml of TH and 1µg/ml of MF)
Materials
Standard gift sample of Terbinafine hydrochloride was provided by Aarti Drugs sales, Mumbai and Mometasone furoate was povided by Glenmark Generics pharmaceutical, Nasik. Combined dose Terbinafine hydrochloride and Mometasone furoate cream sebifinTM plus was purchased from local market. Methanol (AR Grade) was used as solvent, procured from Loba Chemie pvt ltd., Mumbai.
Stock solutions
Stock solution: Standard stock solutions of TH (1000 μg/ml) and MF (1000 μg/ml) were prepared in methanol.
Working solutions
Working solution: Standard working solutions of TH (100 μg/ml) and MF (100 μg/ml) were prepared in methanol and used for the analysis.
Spectral characteristics of TH and MF
Solutions of TH (10μg/ml) and MF (1μg/ml) were prepared separately by appropriate dilution of standard working solution (according to ratio of both the drugs in combined dosage form). Both the solutions were scanned in the spectrum mode from 200 nm to 400 nm (fig.1, 2). Mixture containing TH (10μg/ml) and MF (1μg/ml) was also scanned in the spectrum mode from 200 nm to 400 nm (fig.3).
Preparation of Calibration curves
Appropriate dilutions of the standard working solution were done separately to get 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60,70μg/ml of TH and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7μg/ml MF, respectively. The absorption spectra of all solutions were recorded between 200-400 nm. The absorbances were measured at 282.0 nm (λmax of TH), 248.0 nm (λmax of MF). Beer’s lamberts range for TH and MF were selected and calibration curves of both the drugs were plotted separately. (fig.4-6)
Determination of Absorptivity Value of TH and MF
Appropriate dilutions of the standard working solution were done and the absorbances were measured for TH at 282nm (λmax of TH), and 248nm whereas for MF at 248nm (λmax of MF). The absorptivity values of the drugs were determined at the selected wavelengths. These absorptivity values are the mean of six determinations.
Application of the proposed method for the determination of TH and MF in cream
1gm cream was weighed which is equivalent to 10 mg TH and transferred into 10 ml centrifugal tube, dissolved in methanol and centrifuged for 5 minute at 4000rpm.The solution was filtered through Whatman filter paper and 5ml volume was taken in 50ml volumetric flask and volume adjusted up to the mark with methanol. This solution contains 100μg/ml of TH and 10 μg/ml of MF.
From this solution,4 ml was taken into 10 ml volumetric flask and volume was adjusted up to the mark with methanol.
The absorbance of sample solution was measured against blank solution at 282 nm and 248 nm for absorption correction method. Assay of combined dosage form was done 5 times.(tab. 6). The amount of TH and MF was computed using following equations.
For Analysis of TH
CT=A282/aT282 -------------------(1)
Where,
CT = Concentration of TH gm/100ml,
A282 =Absorbance at 282nm
AT282 = Absorptivity of TH at 282nm
For Analysis of MF
CM= (A248-aT248CT)/aM248 -----------------(2)
Where,
CM = Concentration of MF gm/100ml,
A248 = Total absorbance of Sample at 248 nm ,
aT 248 = Absorptivity of TH at 248nm
aM248 = Absorptivity of MF at 248 nm
Validation[4]
The method was validated with respect to linearity, LOD, LOQ, Accuracy and Precision. (Table 1-5)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
The method discussed in the present work provides a convenient and accurate way for simultaneous analysis of TH and MF. In absorption correction method, wavelengths selected for analysis were 282.0 nm (λmax of TH) and 248.0 nm (λmax of MF). In this method linearity for detector response was observed in the concentration range of 10-70μg/ml for TH and 1-7μg/ml for MF. Percent label claim for TH and MF in cream analysis, by this method was found 101.85% for TH and 98.35% for MF. Low values of LOD and LOQ indicated good sensitivity of proposed method. Accuracy of proposed methods was ascertained by recovery studies. The percent recovery for TH and MF, by this method, was found 101.05% for TH and 99.36% for MF respectively. The proposed method could be employed for routine quality control of TH and MF in combined cream dose formulation.
Figure 4: Calibration Curve of Terbinafine hydrochloride at 282nm
Figure 5: Calibration Curve of Terbinafine hydrochloride at 248nm
Figure 6: Calibration Curve of Mometasone furoate at 248nm.
Table 1: Summary of Validation Parameters
|
Sr. No |
Parameter |
Result |
|
|
Terbinafine hydrochloride |
Mometasone furoate |
||
|
1 |
Absorption maxima (λ max) |
282nm |
248nm |
|
2 |
Range (μg/ml) |
10-70 |
1-7 |
|
3 |
Linearity (μg/ml) |
10-70 |
1-7 |
|
4 |
Standard regression equation |
y = 0.026x + 0.016 |
y = 0.090x + 0.002 |
|
5 |
Intercept |
0.016 |
0.002 |
|
6 |
Slope |
0.026 |
0.090 |
|
7 |
Correlation coefficient (r˛) |
r˛ = 0.999 |
r˛ = 0.998 |
|
8 |
L.O.D (µg/ml) |
0.50 |
0.105 |
|
9 |
L.O.Q (µg/ml) |
1.67 |
0.318 |
|
10 |
Specific absoptivity |
λ282nm=255 |
λ 248nm=901 |
|
λ 248nm=281 |
|||
Table 2: Accuracy data of Terbinafine hydrochloride
|
Set |
Sample conc. |
Standard added |
Total conc. |
Recovered (µg/ml) |
% recovery |
Mean % recovery |
|
80 |
20 µg/ml |
16 µg/ml |
36 µg/ml |
36.63 |
101.75 |
101.43 |
|
36 µg/ml |
36.33 |
100.92 |
||||
|
36 µg/ml |
36.58 |
101.61 |
||||
|
100 |
20 µg/ml |
20 µg/ml |
40 µg/ml |
40.53 |
101.33 |
101.03 |
|
40 µg/ml |
40.48 |
101.20 |
||||
|
40 µg/ml |
40.52 |
100.55 |
||||
|
120 |
20 µg/ml |
24 µg/ml |
44 µg/ml |
44.11 |
100.25 |
100.68 |
|
44 µg/ml |
44.59 |
101.34 |
||||
|
44 µg/ml |
44.20 |
100.45 |
Table 3: Accuracy data of Mometasone furoate
|
Set |
Sample conc. |
Standard added |
Total conc. |
Recovered (µg/ml) |
% recovery |
Mean % recovery |
|
80 |
2 µg/ml |
1.6 µg/ml |
3.6 µg/ml |
3.58 |
99.44 |
99.35 |
|
3.6 µg/ml |
3.56 |
98.89 |
||||
|
3.6 µg/ml |
3.59 |
99.72 |
||||
|
100 |
2 µg/ml |
2 µg/ml |
4 µg/ml |
4.01 |
100.25 |
100.08 |
|
4 µg/ml |
3.98 |
99.50 |
||||
|
4 µg/ml |
4.02 |
100.50 |
||||
|
120 |
2µg/ml |
2.4 µg/ml |
4.4 µg/ml |
4.32 |
98.18 |
98.64 |
|
4.4 µg/ml |
4.34 |
98.64 |
||||
|
4.4 µg/ml |
4.36 |
99.09 |
Table 4: Intraday Precision data of Terbinafine hydrochloride and Mometasone furoate (where, * is the mean of 3 trials)
|
Conc. (µg/ml) |
Mean absorbance ± SD* |
% RSD* |
|||
|
TH |
MF |
TH 282nm |
MF 248nm |
TH282nm |
MF248nm |
|
10 |
1 |
0.243 ± 0.0023 |
0.088 ± 0.0007 |
0.95 |
0.80 |
|
30 |
3 |
0.774 ± 0.0052 |
0.269 ± 0.0022 |
0.67 |
0.82 |
|
60 |
6 |
1.571 ± 0.0069 |
0.534 ± 0.0049 |
0.44 |
0.92 |
Table 5: Interday Precision data of Terbinafine hydrochloride and Mometasone furoate (where, * is the mean of 6 trials)
|
Conc. (µg/ml) |
Mean absorbance ± SD* |
% RSD* |
|||
|
TH |
MF |
TH 282nm |
MF 248nm |
TH282nm |
MF248nm |
|
10 |
1 |
0.243 ± 0.0023 |
0.086 ± 0.0004 |
0.95 |
0.47 |
|
30 |
3 |
0.777 ± 0.0092 |
0.270 ± 0.0031 |
1.18 |
1.15 |
|
60 |
6 |
1.574 ± 0.0054 |
0.532 ± 0.0035 |
0.34 |
0.66 |
Table 6: Result of Assay (where, * is the mean of 5 trials)
|
Label claim (µg/ml) |
Conc. Found (µg/ml) |
||
|
Terbinafine hydrochloride |
Mometasone furoate |
Terbinafine hydrochloride |
Mometasone furoate |
|
40 |
4 |
40.73 |
3.93 |
|
40 |
4 |
40.74 |
3.92 |
|
40 |
4 |
40.75 |
3.92 |
|
40 |
4 |
40.77 |
3.93 |
|
40 |
4 |
40.71 |
3.97 |
|
Average ± SD* |
40.74 ± 0.021 |
3.93 ± 0.019 |
|
|
RSD* |
0.052 |
0.489 |
|
|
% Assay found* |
101.85 |
98.35 |
|
CONCLUSION:
The developed methods were validated as per ICH guidelines and were found to be within the prescribed limit. It concludes that the developed methods are simple, accurate, sensitive and precise and suitable for both authentic and cream dosage form.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
The authors are very thankful to Dr. R.H PARIKH; Principal, Ramanbhai Patel College of Pharmacy, P D Patel Institute of Applied Sciences and Charotar University of Science and Technology, Changa for providing support and research facilities. We are also thankful to Aarti Drugs sales, Mumbai and Glenmark Generics Pharmaceutical, Nasik for providing the gift samples of Terbinafine hydrochloride and Mometasone furoate respectively.
REFERENCE:
1. Drug Profile of Terbinafine hydrochloride, October 2012, http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00764 (accessed on 20/10/2012)
2. Drug Profile of Mometasone furoate, October 2012, http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00857 (accessed on 20/10/2012)
3. Beckett AH and Stenlake JB. Practical Pharmaceutical Chemistry. 2th Edition, CBS Publishers:284-300.
4. “ICH Guidelines Q2 (R1)”, October 2012, http://www.ich.org/ fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q2_R1/Step4/Q2_R1__Guideline.pdf (accessed 10/10/12)
5. British Pharmacopoeia. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, UK, (2), 2011: 2093-2095
6. European Directorate for the quality of medicines and Healthcare European pharmacopoeia7.0 . (2):3047-3048
7. Cardoso SG, Schapoval EES. High-performance liquid chromatographic assay of terbinafine hydrochloride in tablets and creams. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 19(5) ;1999:809-12.
8. Denouel J, Keller H, Schaub P, Delaborde C, Humbert H. Determination of terbinafine and its desmethyl metabolite in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications. 663(2); 1995:353-9.
9. TagliariI MP. Terbinafine: optimization of a LC method for quantitative analysis in pharmaceutical formulations and its application for a tablet dissolution test. Quím Nova.(33); 2010.
10. Jain AJC, Patel SA, Patel ZN, Patel DT. Development and validation of the UV-spectrophotometric method for determination of terbinafine hydrochloride in bulk and in formulation Pharm Methods 2(3); 2011:198-202.
11. ZHANG J.Study on quality specification of terbinafine hydrochloride suppositories. Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2008.
12. Domadiya RS, Jat RK, Chokshi R. Method development and validation for assay of terbinafine hcl in cream by rphplc method. Inventi Rapid: Pharm Ana and Qual Assur. 2012
13. Cardoso SG, Schapoval EES. UV Spectrophotometry and Nonaqueous Determination of Terbinafine Hydrochloride in Dosage Forms. Journal-AOAC international. 82; 1999:830-3.
14. Florea M, Aramă CC, Monciu CM. Determination of terbinafine hydrochloride by ion-pair reversed phase liquid chromatography. Farmacia; 2009.
15. Suma.B.V., Kannan.K, Madhavan. V, Nayar CR. HPTLC Method for determination of Terbinafine in the Bulk drug and Tablet dosage form. International Journal of ChemTech Research. 3(2); 2011: 742-748
16. Cardoso SG. Microbiological assay for terbinafine hydrochloride in tablets and creams.
17. Kuz̆ner J, Erz̆en NK, Kos̆orok M. Determination of terbinafine hydrochloride in cat hair by two chromatographic methods. Biomedical Chromatography. 15(8); 2001: 497–502.
18. Zehender H, Denouël J, Roy M, Le Saux L, Schaub P. Simultaneous determination of terbinafine (Lamisil) and five metabolites in human plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography using on-line solid-phase extraction. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications. 664(2); 1995:347-55.
19. Wang C, Mao Y, Wang D, Yang G, Qu Q, Hu X. Voltammetric determination of terbinafine in biological fluid at glassy carbon electrode modified by cysteic acid/carbon nanotubes composite film. Bioelectrochemistry. 72(1); 2008:107-15.
20. Matysová L, Solich P, Marek P, Havlíková L, Nováková L, Šícha J. Separation and determination of terbinafine and its four impurities of similar structure using simple RP-HPLC method. Talanta. 68(3); 2006:713-20.
21. Saharty YS, Fadia NY, Metwally H. Simultaneous determination of terbinafine HCL and triamcinolone acetonide by UV derivative spectrophotometry and spectrodensitometry.
22. Ramesh RR. Simultaneous analysis of rphplc method development and validation of terbinafine and bezafibrate drugs in pharmaceutical dosage form. Pharmacophore. 2(4); 2011:232-8.
23. El-Saharty YS, Hassan NY, Metwally FH. Simultaneous determination of terbinafine HCL and triamcinolone acetonide by UV derivative spectrophotometry and spectrodensitometry. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 28(3–4); 2002:569-80.
24. British Pharmacopeia. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, UK, (2), 2011, page no. 1487-1489.
25. European Directorate for the quality of medicines and Healthcare European Pharmacopoeia7.0 , (2):2523-2525.
26. USP27, 2004 , official monographs,.1255-1257.
27. Indian Pharmacopoeia. Ministry of health and family welfare, Government of India, New Delhi,(2);2010:1700-1702.
28. Ourique AF; Contri RV; Guterres SS. Set-up of a method using LC-UV to assay mometasone furoate in pharmaceutical dosage forms, Quím Nova.(35); 2006.
29. Vairale AVS, Hima V. B, Sivaswaroop P. Determination of Mometasone Furoate By HPLC In Topical Preparations: Validation,.8(4); 2009.
30. Wulandari LS. TLC Densitometric Determination of Mometasone Furoate in Topical Preparations: Validation. Journal of liquid chromatography and related technologies 1. 26; 2012:109–17.
31. Sahasranaman S, Tang Y, Biniasz D, Hochhaus G. A sensitive liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of mometasone furoate in human plasma. Journal of Chromatography B. 819(1); 2005:175-9.
32. Shaikh SM, Thusleem OA, Tahir M, Kondaguli AV. A simple RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous quantitation of chlorocresol, mometasone furoate, and fusidic acid in creams. International Journal of ChemTech Research. 47(2); 2009:178-83.
33. Kulkarni AA, Ranjane MN, Ranjane PN. Simultaneous estimation of Nadifloxacin and Mometasone Furoatein topical cream by HPTLC method. Scholars Research Library. 2(3); 2010:25-30.
34. Teng XW, Foe K, Brown KF, Cutler DJ, Davies NM. High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of mometasone furoate and its degradation products: Application to in vitro degradation studies. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 26(2); 2001:313-9.
35. Indian Pharmacopoeia. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi.(1);2010:.374
Received on 04.12.2012 Modified on 20.12.2012
Accepted on 22.12.2012 © AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 6(1): January 2013; Page 29-34